“Aims: To determine the breath alcohol elimination rate (A

“Aims: To determine the breath alcohol elimination rate (AER) and Widmark factor derived from the maximum breath alcohol concentration (r(peak BrAC)) in Chinese and Indians in Singapore, and to evaluate the contribution of genetic and non-genetic factors to variability of AER and r(peak BrAC). Methods: A total of 180 subjects ingested a vodka-orange juice mixture, together with a standardized meal and underwent a series of BrAC measurements. Results: Significant inter-ethnic GW4869 differences in AER and r(peak BrAC) were observed in females and

males, respectively. Alcohol dehydrogenase 1B (ADH1B) and acetaldehyde dehydrogenase (ALDH2) genotypes were identified as significant predictors for AER among males, accounting for 8.5% (P = 0.048) and 23.4% (P < 0.001) of the variance, respectively. ADH1B genotype was identified as a significant predictor for r(peak BrAC) among males, accounting for 17.1% of the variance (P = 0.001). In females, however, none of the genotypes were found to be significant predictors for breath AER, and r(peak BrAC). Conclusion:

ALDH2 and/or ADH1B genotypes in males, but not in females, appear to contribute, albeit modestly, to variability in AER and r(peak BrAC). The median AER in Chinese males, Indian males, Chinese females and Indian females is 6.6 mu g dl(-1) h(-1) [99% confidence interval (CI), 5.6-7.5 mu g dl(-1) h(-1)], 6.2 mu g dl(-1) h(-1) (99% Selleckchem Oligomycin A CI, 5.5-7.0 mu g dl(-1) h(-1)), 8.6 mu g dl(-1) h(-1) (99% CI, 7.4-9.7 mu g dl(-1) h(-1)) and 7.4 mu g dl(-1) h(-1) (99% CI, 6.2-8.4 mu g dl(-1) h(-1)), respectively. The median r(peak BrAC) in Chinese males, Indian males, Chinese females and Indian females is 0.0229 (99% CI, 0.0216-0.0268),

0.0209 (99% CI, 0.0190-0.0237), 0.0214 (99% CI, 0.0185-0.0254) and 0.0199 (99% CI, 0.0187-0.0227), respectively.”
“Objectives-The goal of this work was to obtain and evaluate measurements of Selleckchem RG 7112 tissue sound speed in the breast, particularly dense breasts, using backscatter ultrasound tomography.\n\nMethods-An automated volumetric breast ultrasound scanner was constructed for imaging the prone patient. A 5- to 7-MHz linear array transducer acquired 17,920 radiofrequency pulse echo A-lines from the breast, and a back-wall reflector rotated over 360 degrees in 25 seconds. Sound speed images used reflector echoes that after preprocessing were uploaded into a graphics processing unit for filtered back-projection reconstruction. A velocimeter also was constructed to measure the sound speed and attenuation for comparison to scanner performance. Measurements were made using the following: (1) deionized water from 22 degrees C to 90 degrees C; (2) various fluids with sound speeds from 1240 to 1904 m/s; (3) acrylamide gel test objects with features from 1 to 15 mm in diameter; and (4) healthy volunteers.\n\nResults-The mean error +/- SD between sound speed reference and image data was -0.48% +/- 9.1%, and the error between reference and velocimeter measurements was -1.78% +/- 6.50%.

Comments are closed.